<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Linux Live CD/DVDs</title>
	<link>http://www.linuxmonitor.net/blog/2007/03/top-5-linux-live-cddvds.html</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Archibald</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxmonitor.net/blog/2007/03/top-5-linux-live-cddvds.html#comment-20326</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Archibald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxmonitor.net/blog/2007/03/top-5-linux-live-cddvds.html#comment-20326</guid>
		<description>Yeah i used to use Knoppix for my live disc for emergency purposes - but the UBUNTU live disc lets you read AND write to a windows partition.  

That and having GParted ready to go on it makes UBUNTU live disc the new leader, at least in my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i used to use Knoppix for my live disc for emergency purposes - but the UBUNTU live disc lets you read AND write to a windows partition.  </p>
<p>That and having GParted ready to go on it makes UBUNTU live disc the new leader, at least in my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxmonitor.net/blog/2007/03/top-5-linux-live-cddvds.html#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linuxmonitor.net/blog/2007/03/top-5-linux-live-cddvds.html#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Top 5 - most downloaded or?&lt;BR/&gt;The article doesn't mention why the list looks like it does.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If it's more, "Knoppix is better than X because..." then the article should mention it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Just my 2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 5 - most downloaded or?<br />The article doesn&#8217;t mention why the list looks like it does.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s more, &#8220;Knoppix is better than X because&#8230;&#8221; then the article should mention it.</p>
<p>Just my 2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
